Enchanter stats and talents

Maw

Any suggestions on talents and stats that can be valuable for enchanters ?
What are you planning to run as Major / minor talents and why ?

There's very experimented players around, which i'm not.
Please share your knowledges about this class with us 🙏

Edit :

ENCHANTER, Stats Summary
Compiled from community threads and Discord. WIP, corrections welcome. Updated 23 Sep 2026.

CONFIRMED

INT and CHA both scale Enchanter spell damage, and they stack (additive). INT still works as always and affects damage; the CHA bonus is new and added on top. (Derelicte, Discord, 23 Sep 2026)
Enchanters remain INT casters: mana pool and mana regen come from INT only, not CHA. (Derelicte, Discord)
CHA now also gives a bonus to Runeskin. Overall CHA gear has real value beyond just charm, mez and lull now. (Derelicte, Discord)
CHA is used for Charm and Lull. (Official Enchanter deep dive)
Mez does not observably scale with CHA in play: at 200 CHA a 30s mez lasts exactly 30s, no early breaks reported. (Fell, in-game test)

UNCERTAIN / DISPUTED

CHA affecting mez, charm and lull duration: Xilith claimed on Discord it does ("impacts durations, not initial resists, been this way a while"), but Fell's 200 CHA test showed no duration change and no early mez breaks. Unresolved, treat as unconfirmed. (Xilith vs Fell)
How much each stat contributes to damage per spell line (INT vs CHA split) is confirmed to stack but not yet quantified.

riverbender

Magic Resistance is always good

Maw

At which point is it necessary to push CHA higher ?
Active skill related to the Major combat talent charismatic have some uses in a fight ?

Rougar0u

Zero at the moment. Nuke and charm sucks so better to stack into for mana regen/ mana pool

Maw

Rougar0u CHA is not also used on Mez and Lul ?

Mesh

CHA Is used for Lull. Mez is a standalone ability with no stat coefficient AFAIK.

Seems I was completely wrong about CHA not providing mana for Enchanter being a bug.

Bards receiving mana from CHA but Enchanters not is just so bizarre I couldn't bring myself to believe it was intentional.

Relies on Charisma as a primary stat, directly affecting the strength of their spells
https://monstersandmemories.com/class-enchanter

What happened to this?

jobanab

Mesh They consolidated caster stats so classes like Shamans no longer need Int for damage only to split the stats for Enchanters to require Int scaling for some and CHA scaling for others

Mesh

jobanab
Yep. Such a strange decision. One step forward, two steps back.

Rougar0u is right. If nothing changes (hope it does) my plan is to stack full INT and eventually collect a separate CHA set for charming.

Bigger mana pool for stun, mez and debuffs. Rarely use Lull anymore anyway.

jobanab

Mesh

CHA Is used for Lull. Mez is a standalone ability with no stat coefficient AFAIK.

FYI according to Xilith, Mez duration is affected by CHA:

Charm, Mezz and Lull durations are impacted by CHA, but not initial resists

https://discord.com/channels/847846851478945802/847852894078500874/1551980463470542891

Mesh

jobanab
So now mez has a chance to randomly break early based on your CHA? Holy yikes.

I have never seen this documented anywhere before. Is this a new change?

Effectively forces you to build CHA, sacrificing mana and mana regen from INT. Making the stat change even more egregious. At least before you could choose to ignore CHA if you weren't interested in charming.

I swear I have never seen a mez break shortly after being applied the way charm sometimes does.

jobanab

Mesh From more of that conversation:

Xilith: I'm not going into more detail than charisma positively impacts the durations of them
Other: Can you at least tell us if this is a recent change or always has been?
Xilith: It's been like this a while now
Other: Bard too?
Xilith: Yes, but bard mezz/charm is short anyway so it's less observable

Mesh

jobanab
That's a pretty wild undocumented change.

kridak

Jesus that would change allot...i figured with the charm crap we could ignore cha now if not using charm.

Fell

jobanab FYI according to Xilith, Mez duration is affected by CHA:
@Mesh
@kridak

The Dev misspoke I believe. I haven't played much since last patch, but I queried every other enchanter online at this time, and none said they'd seen any early breaks on mez.

Mesh

He might have meant that CHA adds to the max duration of mez.

Would be much better than mez just ending early the way charm does but it's still a wild thing not to document properly in the patch notes.

Fell

Mesh He might have meant that CHA adds to the max duration of mez.

Just tested: at 200 CHA, 30s mez still lasts exactly 30 seconds.

kridak

Fell Thank you!

Mesh

Fell
Weird. There are only two ways I can think of that a duration can be affected. Either it can break early or the maximum duration can be increased.

How else could CHA affect the duration?

Fell

@Mesh

Not seeing it break early either -- unless it's a sub 5% chance, it's not happening. And if he says "its been this way a while", then he's flatly wrong ... unless its a factor that only kicks in if your CHA is very very low (in which case I wouldn't see it).

I told Xilith this in discord, he merely responded with an ambiguous thumbs-up emoji.

Moarcrits

Fell yeah and seeing no dev responses to anything in these threads since the rework happened shows just how disconnected they are from the game. 3 people in the monk forums hammered down numbers and kept saying stuff was broken, devs said nah it's all fine, then stealth patched stuff without documentation but addressed a couple of obvious things openly. It feels like the devs just don't want to admit when something is wrong/broken so they say "no no not true" and then when they finally get to looking at it and realize it, they patch it and say nothing.